Search

Thinx, Inc. to Settle PFAS/PFOA Lawsuit

$ 19.99 · 4.6 (308) · In stock

In late January, Thinx, Inc. announced that it had reached a $5 million settlement agreement to end Dickens v. Thinx, Inc., a class action perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS/PFOA) lawsuit. Thinx will provide up to $5 million to reimburse consumers who bought the company’s signature period underwear between November 12, 2016 and November 28, 2022. To put this in perspective, reimbursements are limited to $7.00 per pair (up to 3 pairs) for consumers who still have receipts and $3.50 per pair (same limit) for those who do not. The initial purchase price of these undies runs up to $35.00 per pair.

State resistance foils law changes, hampering PFAS suits

Thinx Period Underwear Has Settled in a Lawsuit Over Harmful Chemicals & Twitter Has Thoughts

Australian government reaches $132.7m class action settlement with landowners over Pfas contamination, PFAS

What to Know About the Thinx Class-Action Settlement

Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post

Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR

PFAS Water Contamination, Exposure & Cancer Risk

United States: How the PFAS Litigation Landscape is Expanding - Global Litigation News

PFAS LIABILITIES: FOREVER CHEMICALS FACE GLOBAL TRIBUNAL - CAC Specialty

Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR

What the Thinx Class Action Settlement Means for All of Us

What the Thinx Class Action Settlement Means for All of Us

PFAS in period underwear: The Thinx scandal – Mme L'Ovary

PFAS in period underwear: The Thinx scandal – Mme L'Ovary